King County will soon begin biggest expansion of its mental health system in decades (2024)

King County will soon begin biggest expansion of its mental health system in decades (1)

The Mental Health Project is a Seattle Times initiative focused on covering mental and behavioral health issues. It is funded by Ballmer Group, a national organization focused on economic mobility for children and families. Additional support is provided by City University of Seattle. The Seattle Times maintains editorial control over work produced by this team.

King County will soon begin the biggest expansion of its mental health system in decades, creating five centers meant to support people in a crisis.

The Metropolitan King County Council voted unanimously Tuesday to finalize rules determining who can run a crisis care center and how to evaluate them. This plan is the final step before the county begins selecting cities to host a center and the organizations that will run them.

All of this work is geared toward building something that doesn’t exist in King County today: mental health-focused centers where anyone can walk in and receive urgent mental health care. County officials believe the centers could serve as many as 70,000 people annually.

“There’s an opportunity here to make King County a national model for crisis care,” Councilmember Reagan Dunn said in Tuesday’s meeting. “As we know, behavioral health challenges of all kinds are hitting our community harder than ever.”

The funding comes from a $1.25 billion property tax levy voters approved last year to fund mental and behavioral health services. The first center is planned to open in 2026, with more opening in following years. All five centers are expected to be open and operating by 2030.

Advertising

It took five months of discussion and amendments for the council to approve the implementation plan, a detailed 150-page document outlining how centers will be placed, funded and evaluated.

The county doesn’t have these types of centers right now. People in crisis often end up in hospital emergency rooms, jail, or don’t get help at all. County officials and mental health advocates hope the centers can be an important link in building a stronger mental health system that also includes mobile teams and more beds at psychiatric facilities.

Each crisis center will contain a behavioral health urgent care clinic that could screen people and triage them to appropriate services, an observation unit where people could stay for up to 23 hours, and a short-term stabilization unit where people could stay for up to 14 days before being discharged or referred elsewhere. People will be admitted to the crisis centers voluntarily, regardless of their health insurance coverage or ability to pay.

“We’ve thrown spaghetti at the wall many times hoping it’ll stick,” Councilmember Pete von Reichbauer, a co-sponsor of the initiative, said Tuesday. “I think this will stick.”

Months of discussion

Transportation to and from the centers came up repeatedly in the council’s discussions. The plan requires sites to have “meaningful access to public transportation” and proximity to major arterial roads. Councilmembers were concerned about where people would be released from the centers and how they would access transportation back to their homes.

The council added language requiring the centers to work with community health providers, mobile crisis teams, emergency responders or law enforcement to facilitate transportation to the centers. The county will also collect and report data on how people in crisis arrive at the centers.

Advertising

Mental health crisis response

The Seattle Times Mental Health Project has explored different facets of Washington’s mental health crisis response system, how it works and doesn’t, and examined solutions people are bringing to improve it. The discordant network of emergency rooms, psychiatric institutions, jails, courtrooms and law enforcement, which has long faced challenges, has become even more strained since the pandemic began.

What role should police play in mental health calls?

Helping someone in a mental health crisis: What to know

Designated crisis responders, a ‘last resort’ in mental health care, face overwhelming demand

How an old federal rule limits inpatient mental health beds in Washington

The role WA courts play in mental health carewhen someone is in crisis

Seattle’s jail has an ‘astronomical’ suicide rate. Little is changing.

A WA town’s proactive approach to mental health care starts on the street

Painful memories from inside the mental health crisis system | Mental Health Perspectives

What questions do you have about crisis response?

EVENT: Learn about WA’s mental health system and how you can help in a crisis

Download our printable guide for helping someone in a mental health crisis

A proposed amendment would have required the Department of Community and Human Services to coordinate with King County Metro to help people on transit or at a transit center access the centers. Councilmember Sarah Perry withdrew the amendment after other members of the Regional Policy Committee were concerned about giving transit operators additional responsibilities.

The council also removed language that would cap one operator at managing three centers. Earlier this year, seven providers expressed interest in operating centers.

“We want to make sure the best organization is managing the center in their zone, and they don’t want to be precluded from that happening just because we have three others,” Redmond Mayor Angela Birney said at the May 8 committee meeting.

New language also allows the county to purchase a property directly “in exceptional circumstances” with approval from the county council and support from the host jurisdiction.

The county’s vision

The centers are a key part of King County’s vision for a more robust mental health system. Susan McLaughlin, the director of the county’s Behavioral Health and Recovery Division, wants to use funds from the levy to build “the behavioral health system of the future.”

Advertising

“Even as we’re thinking about the mental health residential beds and building those back, we’re not going to build back the same thing we had,” McLaughlin said in an interview ahead of the plan’s passage. “We’re going to build what the system needs and what the future of behavioral health looks like.”

The crisis care centers implementation plan lays out three components of a robust behavioral health crisis system: The centers are “somewhere to go.” Mobile crisis teams throughout the county are “someone to respond.” 988 and crisis hotlines are “someone to call.”

Before the centers are built, other funds from the levy will expand mobile crisis services: teams of mental health workers and peers who travel across the county to de-escalate crises and provide initial assessments, then help the person in crisis find further care. The county said $3 million in initial funds would allow it to expand the number of mobile response teams in the county from 20 to 32.

We’d like to hear from you.

The Mental Health Project team is listening. We’d like to know what questions you have about mental health and which stories you’d suggest we cover.

Get in touch with us at mentalhealth@seattletimes.com.

The county sought proposals this spring from organizations interested in providing mobile crisis services and is expected to announce its new contracts this summer. The county currently contracts with the Downtown Emergency Service Center.

The county will also add teams to its contract with the YMCA of Greater Seattle, which operates the Children’s Crisis Outreach Response System.

Sponsored

What comes next

The county can now begin finding locations and operators for the centers. A request for proposals will open this fall, seeking behavioral health organizations interested in operating the centers.

The levy divides King County into four geographic crisis response zones, which will each host one center. A fifth center will specialize in serving youth.

Earlier this year, the county gauged interest from cities and providers. The following cities expressed interest to the county, according to King County documents obtained by a public records request:

  • Bothell
  • Lake Forest Park
  • Burien
  • Kirkland
  • Kent, Renton and Auburn
  • Kenmore
  • Redmond
  • Bellevue
  • Seattle

The following providers expressed interest:

  • RI International, an international nonprofit organization providing crisis response in Pierce and Thurston counties.
  • Highline United Methodist Church, a church that operates the Burien Day Center & Severe Weather Shelter.
  • Sound, a nonprofit mental health and addiction treatment provider in King County.
  • Pioneer Human Services, a Seattle-based nonprofit assisting people with mental health problems or substance use disorders, and people reentering society after incarceration.
  • Connections Health Solutions, an Arizona-based for-profit operator of behavioral health crisis care centers.
  • Fairfax Behavioral Health, a for-profit subsidiary of national health care company Universal Health Services.
  • Downtown Emergency Service Center, a Seattle-based nonprofit providing homelessness, substance-use disorders and mental health services. DESC operates the Crisis Solutions Center, which offers similar services but requires a referral from police, a mobile crisis team or mental health professional.

A separate center in Kirkland is slated to open this summer, operated by Arizona-based Connections Health Solutions. Before the levy was approved, the city announced plans to build its own mental health crisis center in partnership with Bothell, Kenmore, Lake Forest Park and Shoreline.

If the county selects the center as one of its sites, it could speed up the goal of opening the first center in 2026.

“Kirkland’s interest is that the benefits from the levy are felt in this part of the county, and we’re open to the Connections facility being designated as one of the county’s five clinics, if that’s the case,” Deputy City Manager Julie Underwood said in an email.

Taylor Blatchford: 206-464-2280 or tblatchford@seattletimes.com; Taylor Blatchford is an engagement reporter at The Seattle Times.

King County will soon begin biggest expansion of its mental health system in decades (2024)

FAQs

King County will soon begin biggest expansion of its mental health system in decades? ›

King County will soon begin the biggest expansion of its mental health system in decades, creating five centers meant to support people in a crisis. The Metropolitan King County Council voted unanimously Tuesday to finalize rules determining who can run a crisis care center and how to evaluate them.

What are three ways in which mental health care has changed with regard to historical approaches to care? ›

Mental health has been transformed over the last seventy years. There have been so many changes: the closure of the old asylums; moving care into the community; the increasing the use of talking therapies. They have all had a hugely positive impact on patients and mental health care.

What was the major impact of the community mental health Centers Act of 1963? ›

The CMHCA had a tremendous impact on the mental health system in the United States and upon the profession of mental health counseling. This act not only restructured how services were provided but also who performed those services. No longer was treatment restricted to the medical professionals.

What are the difficulties individuals with mental health problems may face in day to day living? ›

Poor mental health can impact on people's daily life, relationships, social life, employment and finances, making life more challenging and stressful. These impacts may lead to wider issues such as substance misuse, isolation, poor physical health and homelessness.

How do social and cultural attitudes affect individual perceptions of mental health? ›

Different cultures view and understand mental health in different ways, and you might come from a culture where mental health is not talked about openly, or is not understood in the same way it is in the UK. This can feel confusing and make it hard to talk about what you're feeling with friends and family.

What are the three main types of mental health prevention? ›

It consists of three types of prevention: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary prevention seeks to decrease the number of new cases of a disorder or illness (incidence). Secondary prevention seeks to lower the rate of established cases of the disorder or illness in the population (prevalence).

What is the goal of community mental health? ›

The two main functions of a CMHT are to provide assessment and short-term treatment for less severe and time limited disorders, and provide on-going care for people with severe mental health illness, especially those who have complex needs and where there are significant risk factors.

What is the impact of mental illness on communities? ›

Unaddressed mental health problems can have a negative influence on homelessness, poverty, employment, safety, and the local economy. They may impact the productivity of local businesses and health care costs, impede the ability of children and youth to succeed in school, and lead to family and community disruption.

What was the purpose of the community mental health Center Act of 1963? ›

1576, the Community Mental Health Act of 1963 (also known as the Mental Retardation and Community Mental Health Centers Construction Act of 1963), an act to provide federal funding for community mental health centers and research facilities devoted to the causes and treatment of mental retardation.

What is the most difficult mental health condition to live with? ›

Borderline personality disorder is one of the most painful mental illnesses since individuals struggling with this disorder are constantly trying to cope with volatile and overwhelming emotions.

What is the biggest problem for people with mental illness? ›

Mental illness is a leading cause of disability. Untreated mental illness can cause severe emotional, behavioral and physical health problems. Complications sometimes linked to mental illness include: Unhappiness and decreased enjoyment of life.

How does poor mental health affect life? ›

Untreated mental health conditions can result in unnecessary disability, unemployment, substance abuse, homelessness, inappropriate incarceration, and suicide, and poor quality of life. The economic cost of untreated mental illness is more than 100 billion dollars each year in the United States.

How can culture negatively affect your mental health? ›

More often, culture bears on whether people even seek help in the first place, what types of help they seek, what types of coping styles and social supports they have, and how much stigma they attach to mental illness. Culture also influences the meanings that people impart to their illness.

What cultures do not believe in mental health? ›

Overall, Asian Americans are 50% less likely than other racial groups to seek mental health services, says Dr. Ito. In some Asian cultures, mental health challenges are viewed as an individual problem or weakness and talking openly about sadness, disappointment or depression is rarely encouraged.

What are cultural barriers in mental health? ›

Examples of cultural barriers preventing effective mental health treatment include: Different understandings of illness or health. Lack of diversity in the mental health workforce. Mistrust or fear of treatment.

What are the three methods of historical approach? ›

Historical researchers often use documentary, biographical, oral history, and archival methods, in addition to many of the methods commonly used across the social sciences.

What are the three major approaches in the historical development of psychology? ›

There are five major approaches in psychology. These are biological, psychodynamic, behavioural, cognitive and humanistic. Each approach attempts to explain human behaviour differently. An approach is a view that involves certain assumptions about human behaviour.

What are the historical approaches to mental health? ›

Attitudes to mental illness started to change from the late 1700s onwards, with an increased recognition that the solution to mental illness was care and treatment rather than confinement. The 1800s saw the construction of large new mental institutions that offered a range of treatments.

What are the historical perspectives about mental illness? ›

Throughout history there have been three general theories of the etiology of mental illness: supernatural, somatogenic, and psychogenic. Supernatural theories attribute mental illness to possession by evil or demonic spirits, displeasure of gods, eclipses, planetary gravitation, curses, and sin.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Otha Schamberger

Last Updated:

Views: 5295

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Otha Schamberger

Birthday: 1999-08-15

Address: Suite 490 606 Hammes Ferry, Carterhaven, IL 62290

Phone: +8557035444877

Job: Forward IT Agent

Hobby: Fishing, Flying, Jewelry making, Digital arts, Sand art, Parkour, tabletop games

Introduction: My name is Otha Schamberger, I am a vast, good, healthy, cheerful, energetic, gorgeous, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.